Keep your IDE.Give it a review team.

One AI reviewing your code is good. Multiple AIs is better.

MegaLens checks your code with multiple AI models before changes start. Your IDE gets organized findings back (file, line, severity, next step) and stays in charge of the final call.

Fewer missed bugs. Lower AI spend. Same workflow.

In our own 5-skill expansion, MegaLens caught 14 bugs while all 10/10 tests were passing. One bug was only found by a single model in the review team. Single-model review would have shipped it.

A typical review costs about $0.10 to $1. Use your own API keys or prepaid credits.
Works as a plugin inside your editor
Your IDE makes the final call
Your own keys at cost, or prepaid credits

Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, and other editors via MCP (Model Context Protocol).

The problem

One brain doing three jobs. Sound familiar?

Your quota runs out halfway through the week

Claude Code, Codex, Cursor. All use one premium model for everything. Renames, retries, rereading. Your weekly cap or API budget burns through fast because every task costs the same.

Bugs and security gaps slip through

One AI reviewing its own work is like one person proofreading their own email. Auth flaws, logic bugs, edge cases. A second set of AI eyes from a different model family catches what the first one missed.

Doing it yourself is not realistic

Copy code into ChatGPT, then Claude, then Gemini, compare the answers yourself? Nobody has time for that. You need this automated, inside your editor, on every review.

How it works

Three steps. Same IDE. Better results.

Stop making one model do the thinking, the writing, the checking, and the fixing all by itself.

01

Multiple AI models review your code first

Before anything changes, MegaLens gets opinions from different AI model families. They look at the work from different angles. Things one model misses, another usually catches.

02

Your IDE gets a clear checklist, not a wall of text

Instead of raw AI conversation, your IDE gets a short list: which file, which line, how serious, what to do next. Less noise, faster decisions.

03

Your strongest model stays in charge

Your best AI should be making the important decisions, not writing boilerplate. Simple fixes can go to cheaper models. The final review always comes back to your strongest model.

How we compare

Your IDE alone vs. MegaLens vs. PR review bots.

CodeRabbit, Greptile, and Cursor BugBot review code after you open a pull request. MegaLens reviews before your IDE makes changes. Different stage, different results.

Your IDE aloneMegaLens + IDEPR review bots
When it reviewsWhile you codeBefore changes startAfter you open a PR
AI models used12 to 8, from different families1 (or undisclosed)
Cross-checks between modelsNoYes, disagreements preservedNo
Security and compliance reviewSingle model opinionMulti-model, catches what one missesSingle model opinion
Works inside your editorBuilt-inPlugin, same workflowWeb dashboard or PR comments
Routes simple fixes to cheaper modelsNoYes (Claude Code, Codex)No
REST API for automationNoYes (n8n, Zapier, CI/CD)Some
PricingIncluded in IDE plan$15/mo + your own API costs$24 to $48 per user/mo (all-in)

PR review bots compared: CodeRabbit ($24-48/user/mo), Greptile ($30/seat/mo), Cursor BugBot ($40/user/mo).

Beyond code review

From business planning to compliance. Review anything.

Feasibility analysis, risk assessment, security audit, legal compliance, SEO strategy, marketing copy. Wherever you need AI research checked from multiple angles before you act, specialized model squads give you a comprehensive viewpoint.

Auto

Routes to the right models for the job

  • Intent detection
  • Cross-domain queries
  • Multi-skill routing

Audit this PR and propose the patch plan

🔧

Code

Architecture to deployment

  • Bug detection & root cause
  • Database & query optimization
  • Migration strategies

Audit this codebase for performance bottlenecks

🛡️

Security

Find what attackers find first

  • OWASP Top 10 scan
  • Auth & authorization audit
  • Threat modeling (STRIDE)

Audit this auth flow for privilege escalation risks

🔬

Research

Data-driven, multi-perspective

  • Market sizing & TAM
  • Competitor feature matrices
  • Trend analysis & forecasting

Analyze the AI developer tools market: size, growth, players

📈

Marketing

Brand awareness to conversion

  • SEO audit & keyword strategy
  • Paid ads (Google, Meta)
  • Conversion rate optimization

Audit this landing page for SEO and conversion issues

💼

Business

Idea to revenue

  • Pricing & tier design
  • Financial projections
  • Go-to-market strategy

Design a 3-tier pricing strategy. Debate the tradeoffs.

✍️

Copy

Words that convert

  • Landing page heroes
  • Email sequences
  • Cold outreach templates

Write a 5-email onboarding sequence that converts free to paid

⚖️

Legal

AI-assisted, not AI-advised

  • Contract review & redlining
  • Privacy policy (GDPR/CCPA)
  • Risk extraction

Redline this NDA. Flag one-sided clauses.

What your IDE actually gets back.

“A checklist your IDE can act on, not another wall of AI text.”

MegaLens returns a short, organized report: which file, which line, how serious, what to do next. Your IDE reads that instead of processing a long raw AI conversation.

MegaLens outputAudit: “review auth middleware”
Planner
Approve
Code
Approve
Sec
Halt ⚑
Judge
Halt
ConsensusStrong, with dissent

Findings

Token check runs after DB writeHIGH · 4/4
Session cookie flags OKPASS · 4/4
Refresh rotation misses one pathMED · Sec only

⚑ Preserved dissent

Security specialist:“Refresh rotation is skipped when the user hits /api/session/extend. One-line fix. Flagged as medium so the strong model reviews before apply.”

Short enough to read fast

File, line, severity, and a clear next step. Not an essay. Your IDE absorbs it quickly instead of burning tokens on a long raw transcript.

Blind spots are easier to catch

When one specialist catches something the others missed, that disagreement stays visible. Your IDE gets a better shot at what one model alone would miss.

The main model stops wasting effort

Think CEO, not labor. Your best model spends its budget on judgment and review, reading a short list instead of doing the entire first pass itself.

Simple fixes go to cheaper models

When a fix is narrow and already reviewed, MegaLens routes it to a cheaper model. The grunt work costs less. Final review stays with the strong model.

Try it in the IDE you already use.

Start free →

Best for

Where developers get the most out of it.

MegaLens is not for every quick question. It shines when your IDE would otherwise spend real time and real money figuring things out alone.

PR review and bug hunts

Best when your IDE would otherwise burn tokens figuring out what is wrong, what matters most, and what to fix first.

Audit and apply sessions

The sweet spot. MegaLens finds likely issues first, so your IDE works from a clearer map instead of wandering through code alone.

Security-sensitive code paths

Helpful when you want another pass on auth, tokens, or billing before code changes go in. Catches gaps before you pay for outside review.

Simple follow-up fixes

Biggest savings show up when the fix is narrow and repetitive. Your premium model should not be doing grunt work on every small step.

Free on every plan

Runs inside your editor.
No new tool to learn.

Start a review from your editor. Results come back in the same place, no extra tabs or windows. Need programmatic access? There is a REST API too.

Claude Code

Full support

Full review plus automatic fix routing. Cheaper models handle simple fixes, then hand back to your main model.

Codex CLI

Full support

Full review plus automatic fix routing. Lighter models handle fix steps, then switch back for the next review.

Cursor

Findings only

Full review findings delivered in Cursor. Fix routing is coming when Cursor adds support for it.

Copilot and others

Findings only

Full review findings delivered. Fix automation is editor-dependent, and we only ship it when it works.

You choose what MegaLens can access before each run, including which files are shared.
Set up in your editor →

Pricing

Start free.
Upgrade when this is saving you real time and real spend.

A single MegaLens review costs cents. That same review could catch the bug you would have paid a $2,000+ audit firm to find later. Try it free, upgrade when it is saving you real time and money.

Free

$0/mo

Your own API keys · Plugin inside your IDE

What you get

  • Works inside Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Copilot
  • 2-3 AI models review your code per run
  • Your own API keys, zero markup on costs
  • 5 reviews/day, 30/month fair-use cap

Not on free

  • Full 8-model review depth
  • Live-data specialists (Perplexity, Grok)
  • Automatic fix routing on Codex and Claude Code
Start free

Requires your own OpenRouter or provider key

Recommended

Pro

$15/mo

Your own keys · Plugin included · Annual billing at launch

For developers who review and fix code daily in Claude Code or Codex.

What you get

  • Works inside Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Copilot
  • Full 8-model review across every skill
  • Live-data specialists (Perplexity, Grok)
  • Multi-round cross-examination (2-3 rounds)
  • Unlimited reviews, no rate cap
  • REST API access for automation (n8n, Zapier)

Why developers pick it

  • Automatic fix routing on Claude Code and Codex
  • Your strongest model only does the important decisions
Start Pro, $15/mo

Cancel anytime · API costs are separate (you pay providers directly)

No key required

Managed Credits

From $20 prepaid

$9 per 1M blended tokens · MCP included

No API key setup. Just prepay credits and start reviewing. Predictable costs.

What you get

  • Works inside your IDE, no API keys needed
  • Flat $9 per million tokens, predictable cost
  • Cost estimate shown before each review
  • Top up any time, no subscription required

Good fit for

  • Teams without centralized API keys
  • Occasional reviews where a monthly plan is overkill
  • Trying MegaLens before setting up your own keys
Start with credits

Prepaid · No key required

Full automation on Claude Code + Codex · Cursor and Copilot get review findings · REST API for automation workflows.See setup guide →

FAQ

Questions we'd ask too.

How is this different from just using Claude Code or Codex?
Those tools use one AI model for everything: thinking, writing, reviewing, fixing. MegaLens adds a review layer before changes start. Multiple AI models check the work from different angles. Your IDE gets a clear list of findings instead of doing the whole job alone.
Which editors does it work with?
Claude Code and Codex get full automation support. Gemini CLI works partially. Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Zed, and Windsurf get the review findings but cannot auto-route fixes yet. We are upfront about what each editor supports.
How much does a typical review cost?
A few cents to about a dollar depending on depth. Compare that to a professional security audit ($2,000+) or a compliance review ($5,000+). MegaLens catches most of the same issues in minutes, for a fraction of the cost. Not a replacement for the real thing when legal liability is on the line, but a powerful first pass.
Do I need OpenRouter, or can I use my own keys?
Both work. OpenRouter is the easiest, one key connects all AI models. You can also plug in individual provider keys (OpenAI, Google, Anthropic). Either way, zero MegaLens markup on API costs. Or skip keys entirely with prepaid Managed Credits.
What is the difference between Free and Pro?
Free gives you 2-3 AI models per review with your own keys. Pro gives you the full 8-model review, live-data specialists like Perplexity and Grok, and automatic fix routing on Claude Code and Codex. Pro is $15/mo plus your own API costs. Competitors charge $24-48/user/mo all-in but use one model. You pay more in total, but you get 2-8 models cross-checking each other.
Why pay $15/mo when I am already paying for API calls?
API costs are raw compute. Pro pays for the review system on top: which AI models to use for each type of work, how to cross-examine findings, and how to route simple fixes to cheaper models. We have tested which 2-4 model combinations work best for code, security, research, and more. You are paying for that knowledge, not just tokens.
Do you store my code or train on my data?
No. Your API keys are encrypted and only used to call providers on your behalf. MegaLens does not log, store, or train on your code. You can revoke keys or delete your account at any time.
Are there hidden markups on costs?
With your own keys: zero markup. You pay exactly what providers charge. With Managed Credits: a flat $9 per million tokens, everything included. No per-model surcharges, no surprise fees.
Can I pick which AI models review my code?
We handle model selection for you. Each type of work (code review, security audit, research, SEO) routes to a different model mix tuned for that scope. For example, code review uses a tight squad of coding-focused models while research pulls in live-data models like Grok. The value is in the mix, not in picking models yourself.
What happens if I cancel Pro?
You drop back to Free instantly. The plugin still works in your IDE with your own keys, but with lighter review depth. Upgrade again any time.

Your code deserves a second opinion.

Keep your IDE. Give it a review team.

Multiple AI models review your code. Your strongest model makes the decisions. Simple fixes go to cheaper models. All inside your editor, no extra setup.

Start free, no credit card