Every AI has one blind spot.
MegaLens runs your query through the highest-capable versions of Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek simultaneously. They debate. They disagree. You get the consensus — and every minority opinion that didn't survive the vote.
They give you many models. We give you the right answer.
Works inside Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible editor.
The problem
One AI has one perspective.
Confident wrong answers
One model states a hallucination with the same certainty as a fact. There's no second voice to push back. You only find out when it's too late.
Blind spots you can't see
Every model has training biases baked in. Asking one model to identify its own blind spots is like asking a fish if the water is wet.
Dissent gets buried
Multi-model tools that synthesize for you bury the minority opinion in a tidy summary. The outlier that might be the only correct answer? Gone.
How it works
Three steps. One verdict.
Ask anything
Type your question or paste your problem. Select a skill (Code, Security, Research, Legal…) or just say "audit my SaaS" — MegaLens auto-selects the best engines for that task. No generic pick-your-models.
Engines run in parallel
Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek all answer independently and simultaneously. No engine sees another's answer — no anchoring bias, no echo chamber.
Structured debate + verdict
Engines cross-examine each other. Claims are normalized, conflicts are clustered, minority opinions are preserved. You get a consensus score, weighted claims, and every dissenting voice — not buried in a summary.
Built-in Skills
Eight skills. Configured for the work.
Each skill tunes which engines lead, what they prioritize, and how they challenge each other.
Auto
Smart routing — best engine per task
- •Intent detection
- •Cross-domain queries
- •Multi-skill routing
“Compare 3 pricing models and pick the best”
Code
Architecture to deployment
- •Bug detection & root cause
- •Database & query optimization
- •Migration strategies
“Audit this codebase for performance bottlenecks”
Security
Find what attackers find first
- •OWASP Top 10 scan
- •Auth & authorization audit
- •Threat modeling (STRIDE)
“Audit this auth flow for privilege escalation risks”
Research
Data-driven, multi-perspective
- •Market sizing & TAM
- •Competitor feature matrices
- •Trend analysis & forecasting
“Analyze the BYOK AI platform market — size, growth, players”
Marketing
Brand awareness to conversion
- •SEO audit & keyword strategy
- •Paid ads (Google, Meta)
- •Conversion rate optimization
“Audit this landing page for SEO and conversion issues”
Business
Idea to revenue
- •Pricing & tier design
- •Financial projections
- •Go-to-market strategy
“Design a 3-tier pricing strategy — debate the tradeoffs”
Copy
Words that convert
- •Landing page heroes
- •Email sequences
- •Cold outreach templates
“Write a 5-email onboarding sequence that converts free to paid”
Legal
AI-assisted, not AI-advised
- •Contract review & redlining
- •Privacy policy (GDPR/CCPA)
- •Risk extraction
“Redline this NDA — flag one-sided clauses”
Not a summary. A verdict.
“Weighted dissent is the product.”
Competitors let a “chairman” model summarize and bury disagreement. MegaLens does structured claims, conflict clusters, minority opinions, confidence-weighted voting. That's the IP.
Key claims
⚑ Critical dissent preserved
Gemini:“For data-heavy apps, Remix’s nested loader pattern reduces waterfall requests by ~60%. If your SaaS is read-heavy, this matters.”
Structured claims, not summaries
Each claim is extracted, normalized to a schema, and scored by how many engines independently reached it. No chairman paraphrasing.
Conflict clusters
Where engines disagree, MegaLens surfaces the exact point of contention — not a vague 'some models suggest.' You see the fault line.
Critical Dissent Override — hardcoded
When one engine is right and three are wrong, that minority voice is never buried. It surfaces with full context. Hardcoded. Not optional. Critical Dissent Override = trust.
Confidence-weighted voting
Engine reliability weights are tracked per task type. Two engines independently agreeing is not the same as two clones echoing each other.
Convinced? Run your first debate free — no credit card, no commitment.
Start Free →12-category SaaS audit. One prompt.
Security, Legal/GDPR, Tax, Performance, UX, SEO, and 6 more — specialist engines cross-examine your product across every dimension and issue the “Verified by SupremeCode” badge. Competitors sell this as a standalone product for $49–99. Included in Pro.
Pro — MCP server
Web UI shows what's possible.
MCP delivers what to do.
Web = read-only analysis · MCP = repo-aware, IDE-native action
The MCP server connects MegaLens directly to Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible editor. It reads your actual repo, your git history, your file structure. A browser tool physically cannot do this — that capability doesn't exist in a browser context.
Reads your actual code
Ask "audit my auth flow" and every engine sees the real implementation — not your description of it.
Reasons over git history
Engines know what changed, why it changed, and whether a new approach regresses a prior decision.
No duplicate perspective
When you're already inside Claude Code, getting Claude's opinion again wastes a debate slot. MegaLens detects this and substitutes a genuinely different engine.
Pricing
Start free.
Upgrade when you need more depth.
Both plans use your own API keys — either one OpenRouter key or direct provider keys (OpenAI, Google, etc.). You pay API costs directly (~$0.05–0.50/query). The prices below are the MegaLens platform fee only.
Free
Platform fee · API costs via your own keys
Engines & Debate
- 2–3 engines per debate (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek)
- 1 debate round
- Basic synthesis + dissent override
Platform
- All 8 skill types
- Chat history
- BYOK — zero markup
- Unlimited queries (fair use)
- Specialist engines
- Live data (Perplexity, Grok)
- SupremeCode audits
- MCP server for IDEs
Requires your own OpenRouter or provider API key
Pro
Platform fee · API costs via your own keys
Everything in Free, plus:
Engines & Debate
- 8 engines — Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek + specialists
- Devstral (code) + MiMo (reasoning)
- Perplexity + Grok — live data via OpenRouter
- Full cross-examination (2–3 rounds)
- Advanced synthesis + deeper challenge logic
Pro Extensions
- SupremeCode — 12-category audit + verified badge
- MCP server — repo, git, env context in your IDE
Cancel anytime · No hidden platform charges
FAQ
Questions we'd ask too.
How is MegaLens different from opening Claude and GPT in two tabs?
What types of tasks can MegaLens handle?
Do I need OpenRouter, or can I use my own API keys directly?
What's the difference between Free and Pro?
Why pay $19/mo when I'm also paying API costs?
Do you store my API key or train on my data?
Are there hidden markups on API costs?
How much does a typical query cost in API fees?
What is MCP and which IDEs (Claude Code, Codex etc.) does it support?
What is SupremeCode?
Can SupremeCode replace a professional security audit?
Can I choose which AI models are used?
What happens if I cancel Pro?
Not another AI tool — the control layer for all of them.
One AI can be wrong. Four rarely agree on the same mistake.
Bring your API keys. Run your first debate in under two minutes.
Start Free — No Credit Card